hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 12 題
📖 題組：
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
12.
- A impose
- B implicate
- C implement
- D impair
思路引導 VIP
請觀察句子中的轉折詞「but」，它將句子切分為「適度難度」與「嚴重壓力」兩個對比。如果前半段提到適度壓力能「強化」技能，那麼根據對比邏輯，後半段的嚴重壓力對我們的注意力和記憶力會產生什麼樣的作用？這個作用是正面的還是負面的呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到上下文的邏輯轉折並選出 impair，說明你不僅詞彙量紮實，對文章結構的掌握也十分敏銳。
語境邏輯與對比關係
這題的解題關鍵在於連接詞 but 所引導的對比結構。前一句提到「適度的困難」能「強化（strengthen）」因應技巧；然而，後半句轉而討論「嚴重或重複的壓力」，語氣顯然轉為負面。因此，空格處需要一個能描述壓力對注意力、記憶力及情緒調節產生「負面影響」的動詞。impair 意為「損害、削弱」，完美契合了生理或心理功能受損的語境。
▼ 還有更多解析內容