hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 14 題
📖 題組：
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
14.
- A dismiss
- B erode
- C tailor
- D subordinate
思路引導 VIP
若作者強調心理韌性是「個人與環境之間的互動」，而非一種通用的內在資產，那麼在設計解決問題的方法時，你認為這些方法應該是「一體適用」的，還是應該與使用者所處的「特定環境需求」緊密結合呢？你會用哪個動詞來形容這種「調整以適應特定對象」的動作？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你答對了！你能精準選出 tailor，代表你已經完全理解文章核心：心理韌性並非固定特質，而是一種「動態調節」的過程。這題的關鍵在於文末提到的「個人與環境的互動」，既然每個人面臨的壓力源（stressors）與社交資源都不同，介入措施（interventions）自然不能一成不變，而必須針對特定情況量身打造。
語境與詞彙的精準對接
在學術與專業語境中，tailor 常由「裁縫」延伸為「使目標符合特定需求」之意。選項中的 (A) dismiss（排除）、(B) erode（侵蝕）與 (D) subordinate（使從屬）在邏輯上都無法與「根據特定壓力源調整策略」的正向介入目標相契合。這道題目具有極佳的鑑別度，測驗重點不在於艱澀的單字，而在於學生是否能從前文的「動態觀點」推論出後文「客製化處理」的必然性，這正是高階閱讀理解中最重要的**上下文連貫性（Cohesion）**判斷。