hce_tcu
115年
英文
第 32 題
📖 題組：
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
According to this passage, critics are concerned that corporate mindfulness programs may ___.
- A replace systemic reform with individual coping strategies
- B decrease overall employee productivity
- C increase workplace competition
- D overemphasize spiritual instruction
思路引導 VIP
請仔細閱讀文章第三段關於企業環境的部分：當員工因為工作量過大而感到壓力時，批評者認為公司推行正念練習的焦點是放在「解決公司體制的問題」上，還是放在「要求員工改變自己去適應」呢？這兩種處理方式的對象有什麼本質上的不同？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
掌握企業正念的爭議核心
你能精確鎖定批評者對「企業正念課程」的質疑，表現得非常出色！這題考查的是閱讀理解中的細節推論能力。文中第三段明確指出，在企業環境中，正念練習有時被當作協助員工應對「過度工作量」的手段，其潛在風險在於將責任從「系統性問題」（如過勞、職場剝削）轉移到個人身上。因此，選項 (A) 以個人應對策略取代系統性改革 完美契合了文中「將責任從制度移開」的邏輯。
難度評估與觀念切入
▼ 還有更多解析內容