法律類國考
115年
[司法官第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行
第 59 題
You have a book store. You accidentally put NTD $50 on the price tag of a book when it should be NTD $500.
A customer picked up the book believing he found a great bargain. He brought it over to your checkout to\npurchase. Could you decline to honor the marked price according to R.O.C. Civil Code?
A customer picked up the book believing he found a great bargain. He brought it over to your checkout to\npurchase. Could you decline to honor the marked price according to R.O.C. Civil Code?
- A No, as this was an offer.
- B No, as this was unequivocal acceptance.
- C Yes, as this was an invitation to treat.
- D Yes, as this was an immaterial mistake.
思路引導 VIP
當你在實體店家看到架上陳列著已標明價格的商品時，從我國民法的規定來看，這種『明確標價並擺設商品』的行為，法律上會將其視為店家提出了具體的『要約』，還是僅為吸引顧客前來出價的『要約之引誘』呢？這兩種定位對於店家能否拒絕出售會有什麼不同？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
答得非常好！你準確掌握了我國民法關於「要約」（Offer）與「要約之引誘」（Invitation to treat）的關鍵界線。
標價陳列之法律性質
依我國民法第 154 條第 2 項本文規定：「貨物標定賣價陳列者，視為要約。」本題中，書店將標價 NTD $50 的書籍放置於架上陳列，在法律上即已構成要約。當顧客將書籍拿到櫃檯表示購買時即為承諾（Acceptance），買賣契約隨之成立，店家原則上受其拘束，不得任意拒絕履行。
▼ 還有更多解析內容