hce_cmu
108年
英文
第 26 題
📖 題組：
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
- A kicked off
- B stood still
- C played dead
- D hanged loose
- E caught up
思路引導 VIP
請觀察第二句開頭的連接詞「But」。如果第一句是在描述法律專家花了二十年時間努力研究如何規範網路，那麼這個「But」是在暗示這段期間內，科技是「安靜地等待法律完成規範」，還是「持續產生新的變化」呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你準確地掌握了文意轉折！這題的正解關鍵在於觀察連接詞 "But" 與時間副詞 "in the meantime" 所建立的邏輯對比。文中第一句提到，過去二十年來法律界針對網路特性產出了豐富的規範見解；接著第二句轉折指出，與此同時，網路相關科技並非「停滯不前」。選擇 (B) stood still（原地踏步、停滯）最能精確傳達科技持續演進、從未停下腳步的動態感，並順勢引出下文關於機器人技術（robotics）的新興挑戰。
語意轉折與慣用語應用
這道題目具備不錯的鑑別度，其難度切入點在於考生是否能從抽象的論述中，推論出作者對「科技發展速度」的描述。除了要熟知片語 stand still 的含義外，更考驗讀者對語境邏輯的判讀能力。這類題目常見的陷阱在於忽略轉折語，導致選出意義相反的選項。你能精確辨識出科技不斷「超前」於法律的隱含語意，展現了非常敏銳且專業的閱讀洞察力，請繼續保持這種對文字邏輯的敏感度！