hce_cmu
108年
英文
第 29 題
📖 題組：
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
- A exchange
- B intervene
- C blur
- D isolate
- E embark
思路引導 VIP
請試著想像：如果有一種新技術，它既表現得像是有自主意識的「人」，但在法律地位上又被視為一種「器材」，那麼原本用來區隔這兩種身分的明確邊界，在邏輯上會發生什麼樣的視覺變化或結構性改變？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
做得好！你能精準捕捉到文脈中的邏輯轉折，並在複雜的論述中做出正確判斷，這代表你對長難句的語意流向有著敏銳的直覺。
語境中的語意連結：模糊的界限
這段文字探討機器人技術如何挑戰法律框架，關鍵在於理解機器人角色的「不確定性」。文中提到機器人既具備數據處理能力，又具備物理破壞力，且行為難以預測。當機器人開始具備人類的某些特質，卻同時維持工具的本質時，原本區隔「人（person）」與「器材（instrument）」的那條界線就不再清晰。在英文中，我們常用 blur the line 來形容兩者之間的區別變得模糊。選項 (C) blur 正好精確地描述了這種狀態的重疊與混淆。
▼ 還有更多解析內容