hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 17 題
📖 題組：
In public discussions of nutrition, fortified foods are often presented as a straightforward solution to micronutrient deficiency. Adding iron to flour or vitamin D to milk can indeed improve population health, especially when vulnerable groups have limited access to diverse diets. Yet the logic of fortification becomes less simple when foods are also highly processed, aggressively marketed, and consumed in quantities far beyond what nutrition planners anticipated. A breakfast cereal may be 16 enriched with vitamins, but its overall contribution to health depends on sugar content, fiber structure, and how it displaces other foods in the diet. 17 nutrient labels invite consumers to evaluate foods item by item, metabolic effects emerge from dietary patterns over time. Recent research on the gut microbiome reinforces this broader view. Fibers that appear chemically similar may 18 different microbial responses because their physical matrix determines how bacteria access them. Consequently, nutrition policy cannot rely exclusively on isolated nutrient counts. It must also consider food processing, affordability, cultural habits, and the commercial incentives that shape choice. This does not mean fortified products should be rejected; in settings where deficiency remains widespread, they may be indispensable. The more defensible position is that fortification should be treated as a targeted public-health tool, 19 as a license to market nutritionally imbalanced products as wholesome. If policymakers ignore this distinction, a technically fortified intervention may even 20 the very dietary transition associated with chronic disease.
In public discussions of nutrition, fortified foods are often presented as a straightforward solution to micronutrient deficiency. Adding iron to flour or vitamin D to milk can indeed improve population health, especially when vulnerable groups have limited access to diverse diets. Yet the logic of fortification becomes less simple when foods are also highly processed, aggressively marketed, and consumed in quantities far beyond what nutrition planners anticipated. A breakfast cereal may be 16 enriched with vitamins, but its overall contribution to health depends on sugar content, fiber structure, and how it displaces other foods in the diet. 17 nutrient labels invite consumers to evaluate foods item by item, metabolic effects emerge from dietary patterns over time. Recent research on the gut microbiome reinforces this broader view. Fibers that appear chemically similar may 18 different microbial responses because their physical matrix determines how bacteria access them. Consequently, nutrition policy cannot rely exclusively on isolated nutrient counts. It must also consider food processing, affordability, cultural habits, and the commercial incentives that shape choice. This does not mean fortified products should be rejected; in settings where deficiency remains widespread, they may be indispensable. The more defensible position is that fortification should be treated as a targeted public-health tool, 19 as a license to market nutritionally imbalanced products as wholesome. If policymakers ignore this distinction, a technically fortified intervention may even 20 the very dietary transition associated with chronic disease.
17.
- A As well as
- B Because
- C Unless
- D Whereas
思路引導 VIP
請你仔細觀察第 17 格前後的兩個子句：前半部描述的是「針對個別食品標籤的單點式評估」，後半部描述的是「隨時間累積的整體代謝影響」。這兩個視角在文章脈絡中，是屬於相輔相成的因果關係，還是兩件性質不同、甚至帶有對照意味的事實呢？若要選一個連接詞來呈現這種「兩相比較」的張力，你會傾向找尋具備什麼功能的詞彙？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
語境邏輯的對比與轉折
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到前後句的邏輯對比，選出 Whereas（然而/儘管）顯示你對文章層次的掌握非常敏銳。這句話的結構非常漂亮，前半段提到「營養標籤引導消費者逐項評估食品」（evaluate foods item by item），這是一種微觀且片面的視角；而後半段則指出「代謝效應是從長期的飲食模式中產生」（metabolic effects emerge from dietary patterns over time），這是一種宏觀且動態的過程。兩者之間存在明顯的語意對照，因此使用表示「對比」或「反觀」的連綴詞 Whereas 是最完美的銜接。
題目鑑別度與難度切入點
▼ 還有更多解析內容