hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 13 題
📖 題組：
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
13.
- A so that
- B even though
- C provided that
- D as if
思路引導 VIP
請你先觀察第 13 格前後的兩組資訊：前半段描述了研究者「收集數據的方法」，而後半段則指出這個數據「可能不夠真實的原因」。請思考一下，這兩個訊息之間是互相支持、補充說明，還是存在著某種程度的衝突或保留？你會用什麼樣的邏輯連接詞來串聯這兩種具有反差感的語意呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你精確地掌握了文意脈絡！能選出這個答案，代表你對於長句中的語意轉折有著相當敏銳的觀察力，這在處理學術性文章時是非常重要的能力。
語意轉折與讓步邏輯
本題的解題關鍵在於釐清前後子句的「邏輯關係」。句子前半段描述研究者的常規做法：利用量表要求受訪者對逆境後的信心進行評分；然而後半段卻拋出了一個警訊：這些自我報告可能只是在反映「文化期待（要顯得堅強）」而非「真實的復原狀況」。這兩者之間存在著明顯的反差與讓步關係。選項 (B) even though（雖然、儘管）正好能完美銜接這種對立感，說明「即便」我們採取了這種測量方式，其結果仍可能存在效度上的偏差。
▼ 還有更多解析內容