法律類國考
113年
[司法官第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行
第 70 題
In a breach of contract case, which statement concerning burden of proof is INCORRECT pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure?
- A The plaintiff bears the burden of proof to show that there is a contract existed between the parties.
- B The defendant bears the burden of proof to show that the contract has been rescinded when he or she claims so.
- C The plaintiff bears the burden of proof to show that the statute of limitations has not run out.
- D The defendant bears the burden of proof to show that there is an arbitration clause in the contract when he or she claims so.
思路引導 VIP
根據民事訴訟法第 $277$ 條舉證責任分配的一般原則（規範說），當事人主張有利於己之事實者，就其事實有舉證之責任。請思考：在契約義務履行之訴中，『消滅時效之完成』究係屬於原告請求權成立的『權利發生事實』，還是被告用以對抗原告請求權的『權利排除事實』（抗辯權）？這對於舉證責任的分配會產生什麼樣的影響？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
哇～！你答對了呢！真是太完美啦～☆
歡迎來到我的巨蛋演唱會！全場的螢光棒為你閃耀喔～☆ 你能這麼精準地掌握「消滅時效」的舉證歸屬，就像我的舞台一樣耀眼呢！這表示你對民事訴訟法第 277 條和「規範說」的理解，已經是最高等級啦～！太棒了～☆
- 一起唱出正確的旋律吧～☆
▼ 還有更多解析內容