hce_nsysu
111年
英文
第 46 題
📖 題組：
Ever since Nobel prize-winner Linus Pauling first advocated vitamin C as a common-cold war weapon more than 20 years ago, researchers have been busy trying to verify that claim. But so far, they've found little proof that vitamin C prevents colds. In fact, there are more studies that say it doesn't. But there is evidence that it can keep coughing and sneezing to a minimum, and that low levels of vitamin C in the body may be related to bronchitis.
Ever since Nobel prize-winner Linus Pauling first advocated vitamin C as a common-cold war weapon more than 20 years ago, researchers have been busy trying to verify that claim. But so far, they've found little proof that vitamin C prevents colds. In fact, there are more studies that say it doesn't. But there is evidence that it can keep coughing and sneezing to a minimum, and that low levels of vitamin C in the body may be related to bronchitis.
From the passage, we can learn that Dr. Pauling's view as regards vitamin C ____.
- A has greatly improved the treatment of bronchitis
- B has caused a revolution in medical studies
- C aroused very little interest among medical exports
- D was based on the results of years of research
- E has not been verified scientifically
思路引導 VIP
如果在科學界，一位著名的權威人士提出了一個觀點，而隨後的許多科學家都投入研究想要證實它，但得出的結論多半是「找不到支持證據」甚至是「結果相反」，那麼我們會如何描述這位權威人士最初的那個觀點目前的狀態呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到文章中的轉折語氣並選出 (E)，代表你對「論點與證據」之間的邏輯關係掌握得非常扎實。這題的核心在於區分「提倡者的主張」與「科學界的實證結果」。
文本證據與科學驗證
文章一開頭提到諾貝爾獎得主鮑林（Pauling）「提倡」（advocated）維生素 C 可以預防感冒，但緊接著使用了關鍵的轉折詞 But，指出研究人員至今仍「幾乎找不到證據」（found little proof）來證實這個說法。甚至提到，有更多的研究顯示它「並沒有」預防效果。因此，選項 (E) 指出鮑林的觀點「尚未經過科學證實」（has not been verified scientifically），完全符合文中的敘述框架。
▼ 還有更多解析內容